In an epic miscalculation that backfired spectacularly, prosecutors within the Manhattan hush cash trial of Donald Trump known as Hope Hicks to the witness stand. The second cross-examination started, their misbegotten case in opposition to the previous president started to break down.
Hicks, who served as press secretary in the course of the 2016 presidential marketing campaign, defined that Trump’s motive for suppressing salacious tales was to guard his spouse, Melania. “Completely…I don’t assume he wished anybody in his household to be damage or embarrassed about something on the marketing campaign. He wished them to be happy with him.”
The account by Hicks demolishes District Lawyer Alvin Bragg’s main declare in opposition to Trump that he paid porn star Stormy Daniels for her silence with the intent to profit his marketing campaign and, thereby, affect the election by “illegal means.” On the contrary, it properly corroborates the findings of a federal investigation that no crimes had been dedicated, or marketing campaign finance legal guidelines damaged as a result of there was one other function for the non-disclosure settlement that Daniels signed.
HOPE HICKS: COHEN CALLED HIMSELF ‘MR. FIX IT’ ONLY BECAUSE HE ‘BROKE IT’
Just like the prosecution witnesses earlier than her, Hicks disparaged Bragg’s deliberate star witness, Michael Cohen, Trump’s one-time private lawyer. “He used to love to name himself Mr. Repair-It, however it was solely as a result of he first broke it.” Ouch! However that denigrating comment is tame in comparison with the opposite derisive feedback which were leveled to date on the unbearable Cohen, who’s a convicted liar who went to jail.
It was foolhardy for Bragg’s authorized group to name Hicks. A rank amateurish mistake. Her testimony was redundant and pointless. However below the speculation that no useless horse can be left unbeaten, prosecutors appeared decided to have her inform the jury what they already knew.
Hicks confirmed that Trump was conscious that Cohen paid off Daniels to finish what can pretty be described as aggressive blackmail calls for. When the election drew close to, Daniels ratcheted up her grasping scheme to revenue from Trump by threatening to go public a few supposed affair, which he denied. Not by the way, she renounced the purported tryst. Then, in a head-spinning maneuver, she recanted her repudiation.
NY VS. TRUMP: DA BRAGG’S WEB OF DECEIT STARTS TO UNRAVEL
The cost to Daniels, no matter its intent, proved to be a waste of cash. Whereas the Nationwide Enquirer by no means revealed her story, Hicks testified that different information shops did so prematurely of the election. In the long run, it didn’t appear to matter a lot to voters who had been extra invested in coverage concepts slightly than private points. The unlikeable Hillary Clinton was additionally an element.
It’s value repeating that the jury already is aware of all concerning the Daniels transaction. It has been the topic of countless discourse by different witnesses for the reason that trial commenced. This makes Hicks’ testimony superfluous, and it proves nothing. After all, Trump knew concerning the funds. He doesn’t contest it. He says he adopted his lawyer’s recommendation, who dealt with every little thing. So what?
The funds made weren’t unlawful. Non-disclosure contracts in trade for silence aren’t illegal. Killing unfavorable tales violates no statutes. Extra to the purpose, it’s not against the law for Trump to learn about a non-crime. That may be a mindless syllogism.
So, the place precisely is the crime? To cite a memorable line from “Shakespeare In Love,” “I don’t know…it’s a thriller!”
NY VS. TRUMP: A TRIAL IN SEARCH OF AN IMAGINARY CRIME
There may be, nonetheless, no thriller behind Alvin Bragg’s politically pushed prosecution of Trump. Out of skinny air, the DA conjured up expired misdemeanors, dumped them right into a Cuisinart, tossed in a rubbish state statute that doesn’t apply to a federal election, hit the “puree” button, after which poured out an absurd concoction of fake felonies.
The one crime right here is Bragg’s grotesque abuse of the legislation.
The authorized wrangling between two attorneys who executed a authorized contract on behalf of their respective purchasers is what attorneys do day by day. It was booked in Trump’s personal enterprise information as “authorized bills” as a result of that’s what they had been. Nothing was falsified, as Bragg claims in his indictment. However the D.A. needs to place Trump in jail for following his legal professional’s authorized recommendation.
Bragg should have skipped his legislation college class when the “doctrine of impossibility” was taught. You’ll be able to’t decide an empty pocket. Nor are you able to unlawfully affect an election after the election. In his expenses, Bragg contends that Trump falsified enterprise information in 2017. However the presidential contest occurred in 2016, making it inconceivable to even full the supposed crime for which he stands accused.
CLICK HERE FOR MORE FOX NEWS OPINION
That is simply one of many many fallacies embedded in Bragg’s frivolous case. The alleged details and proof don’t quantity to against the law. On this foundation, any goal or impartial decide would have way back granted the protection movement to dismiss the case. Regrettably, Juan Merchan is on the bench. It’s as if he jettisoned his black gown to imagine the perform of a prepared accent to Bragg’s phony expenses.
With Hicks on the stand, prosecutors dwelled interminably on the notorious “Entry Hollywood” tape. It has no bearing on the case, thoughts you, besides to smear Trump with irrelevant and prejudicial data. Merchan’s ruling to allow it as admissible proof is a reversible error, simply because it proved to be within the just lately dismissed intercourse crimes conviction of Harvey Weinstein.
Bragg ought to flip himself in to authorities for impersonating an trustworthy lawyer. To meet his marketing campaign promise to nail Trump, the D.A. has manipulated the legislation and mangled proof to engineer a wrongful conviction. He focused Trump in a textbook case of selective prosecution. That is an affront to the rules of equity and equal justice.
If polling knowledge is right, Individuals are offended by this huge high spectacle. They resent seeing the main candidate for president taken off the marketing campaign path and tied up in court docket by a partisan enemy. Bragg’s legally anemic case solely accentuates the injustice.
There is no such thing as a mistaking the boomerang impact right here. Voters see this for exactly what it’s: a pathetically weak case designed to break Trump politically to the advantage of President Joe Biden’s reelection probabilities.
Let’s hope the jurors see that, too.
CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM GREGG JARRETT